After they bombed the New Carissa, it underlined the fact that tankers are
not the only types of ship subject to drastic anti-pollution measures ...
If you can't afford to ignore what's in the legislative, regulatory and
enforcement pipeline you need to attend this conference ...
Maritime Legislation, Regulation & Policy
Washington, DC, September 22 & 23, 1999

Squeeze Play

Defense titans consolidate to get a bigger chunk of the Navy pie

by John Snyder
Senior editor
Marine Log

Trying to follow the merger and acquisition news in the U.S. shipbuilding industry these days is almost like playing the shell game. You don't know where the little pea is going to wind up. The latest shipbuilding shuffle involves further consolidation of the U.S. Navy's shipbuilding industrial base. Litton Industries, Inc. (NYSE: LIT), Woods Hill, Calif., the parent of Ingalls Shipbuilding, Pascagoula, Miss., one of the Big Six defense-oriented shipyards, has made an offer for Avondale Industries, New Orleans, La., (NASDAQ: AVDL). Shareholders of Avondale were expected to accept the cash deal, sweetened to $39.50 per share or about $529 million.
Newport News, which had made an earlier bid to acquire Avondale, withdrew from the acquisition sweepstakes.
Interestingly, Litton had made a separate offer to acquire Newport News Shipbuilding (NYSE: NNS), Newport News, Va., in a stock-for-stock transaction based on a $35.61 price for NNS shares and $64.75 price for LIT shares. The deal would have been worth in the neighborhood of $1.8 billion. It backed off the deal after Defense Secretary William Cohen publicly opposed the merger of Litton and NNS, saying it would dilute competition in the U.S. Navy shipbuilding market. The Pentagon must approve the merger.
Earlier this year, the Pentagon blocked General Dynamics' bid for Newport News. GD is already the largest shipbuilding group, and includes the three other shipyards in the Big Six: Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine, Electric Boat, Groton, Conn., and National Steel & Shipbuilding Co., San Diego.

The Big Six, or the Big Three, or the Big Two plus One--depending on how you count these things--are united for lobbying purposes under the ASA (American Shipbuilding Association) banner. At the moment, Navy ordering has plateaued (see graph), and employment at ASA yards has been falling. Nonetheless, Navy work is still where the Big Bucks are. What we are seeing now is a jockeying to be in the best position when the next big Navy building round starts early in the new millenium.

 

CONSOLIDATION ON
THE COMMERCIAL SIDE, TOO

Of course, the Big Six are not the only shipbuilders that have been doing the merger tango. Over the last two years, new companies with old roots and familiar names have emerged in the commercial shipyard sector. Conrad Industries, First Wave/Newpark Shipbuilding, Friede Goldman International, and United States Marine Repair have all either been formed through mergers or grown through acquisitions.

 Company  Symbol
Click for Yahoo Finance quote
Labor force FY Rev.
($ million)
 % change  Backlog ($ million)  
Atlantic Marine Holding Co., Jacksonville (4 yards) Private  1,800  N/A  N/A  $200+  
Avondale Industries, Inc., New Orleans AVDL  5.500  $748.9 22% $1,800 Backlog as of March 31, 1999;
Bollinger Shipyards, Inc., Lockport, LA (9 yards) Private  1,500  N/A N/A  $200+  
Cascade General, Inc., Portland, Ore Private  840 $80 (19%)  $30  
FirstWave/Newpark, Houston (6 yards) Private  1,100  $100* 137% N/A *Estimate for fiscal year 1999; First Wave had $82 million in fiscal year 1998, deriving some 78% of its revenue from repair;
Friede Goldman Int'l, Inc., Jackson, MS (4 yards) FGI 3,000 $382.9 238.3  $407 Backlog as of March 31, 1999;
General Dynamics, Falls Church, VA (BIW, Electric Boat & NASSCO)  GD  21,700 $2,666 15.3%  $11,728  
Halter Marine Group, Inc., Gulfport, MS (22 yards)   HLX  7,500 $998.1 49%  $656 Halter Marine's fiscal year ends March 31;
Litton Industries, Wood Hills, CA (Ingalls Shipbuilding)  LIT  11,300 $1.030 (7.2%) $3,472 Litton's fiscal year ends July 31.
Newport News Shipbuilding, Newport News, VA (Newport News & Continental Maritime)  NNS 18,400 $1,862 9.1% 3,800 Backlog as of March 31, 1999;
Todd Pacific Shipyards, Inc., Seattle  TOD 900 $109.5 (4.2%) $53  
United States Marine Repair, Inc., Norfolk, VA (Norshipco, Pacific Fabricators, SWM- Ingleside, San Pedro & San Diego, and SF Drydock)  Private 3,000  N/A N/A N/A  
Some figures, such as workers and backlog, may be estimated; Sources include company reports, SEC filings, Marine Log database

THE BITER BITTEN
One of the most ravenous of this acquisition pack was the Halter Marine Group, which, after going public in 1997, rapidly gobbled up chunks of capacity on the U.S. Gulf Coast. By 1998, it had grown to include 26 small- and medium-sized shipyards and some 9,200 employees, and boasted a record order backlog of close to $1 billion. Two problems were inherent, however, in this tremendous growth. One was its reliance on high levels of newbuilding contracts from the offshore energy sector-some 70% of the revenue of the record backlog was accounted for by OSV and rig building. Second was the large influx of unskilled or under-skilled workers that was absorbed into the group's labor pool.
With the price of oil dipping this past year, high-flying Halter took a tumble, as the efficiency of the company's production faltered, OSV newbuilding contracts dried up, and losses piled up on a series of drilling barges. Losses totaled $1 million for the quarter ending December 31, 1998.
Halter has since implemented a number of cost-cutting measures, including slashing its labor force by 1,500 and scaling back operations at its TDI-Halter unit, consolidating eight facilities into four.
Meanwhile, though, TDI-Halter has taken a 35% slice in a company that will operate the Belleli fabrication yard in Taranto, Italy. That yard specializes in TLP hulls. The move is significant in that it takes TDI-Halter into the production end of the offshore market, which is somewhat less volatile than the exploration-related market.
On announcing net income of $13.3 million, or $0.46 per share on revenue of $998.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31,1999, company chairman John Dane III said, "Halter Marine Group has successfully weathered a very turbulent fiscal year."
He added, "During a period that was marked by great uncertainty for companies serving the offshore energy markets, Halter took a number of steps to protect the company's strategic position in an improving market."
One of those steps is Project ABC, said Dane, which, "continues to provide operating efficiencies that will make Halter more competitive. We expect that during fiscal 2000, we will internalize the processes that this effort has produced and greatly expand it across our operations," Dane said. Capital spending and administrative costs were cut drastically.
Halter also entered into an Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement with a group of banks providing for maximum borrowings of $125 million.
With its ship now righted, Halter confirmed that it was engaged in discussions with a company involved in the "oilfield service industry" regarding a possible stock-for-stock business combination.
That company turned out to be Friede Goldman International, Inc. FGI's chief executive J.L. Holloway had hinted that the company was looking to expand through acquisitions.
In an interview with cable news network CNBC, Holloway said the FGI would continue to "be aggressive in its acquisitions" and wants to up its market share in the offshore energy vessel business.
Recent earnings by FGI catapulted it to number one in Business Week's Hot Growth rankings.
Now the merger is official. After months of rumors and speculation, the Halter Marine Group, Inc., Gulfport, Miss., and Friede Goldman International Inc., Jackson, Miss., announced early this month the signing of a definitive agreement to enter into what they called a "strategic combination."
The combined company---to be named Friede Goldman Halter, Inc. and headquartered in Gulfport, Miss.---will have a backlog of over $1 billion and a workforce of more than 12,000. On a proforma basis for the 12 months ended March 31, 1999, the combined company would have generated revenue of nearly $1.5 billion and would have total assets of over $900 million.
Under the terms of what is described as a "merger of equals'' agreement, each Halter share will be exchanged for 0.4614 of a share of Friede Goldman. Based on the closing price for Friede Goldman stock on June 1, the exchange rate values Halter shares at $7.55, or a 28% premium over the average for the 30 trading days ended May 25.
Friede Goldman chairman and CEO J.L. Holloway will serve as chairman and CEO of Friede Goldman Halter. Halter chairman, president and CEO John Dane III will serve as vice chairman, president and chief operating officer.
The merger agreement provides for a management succession plan that is intended to result in Dane succeeding Holloway as chairman and CEO in two years. The merger agreement, which has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies, is subject to customary closing conditions, including shareholder and regulatory approvals, and is expected to close in the third quarter of 1999. Holloway, who owns 43% or so of the outstanding shares of FGII, has agreed to vote his shares in favor of the merger transaction. Shares of the combined company stock will continue to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

NEW PLAYER EMERGES
Other merger and acquisition news on the commercial side could involve FirstWave Marine, Inc., Houston.
FirstWave, which consists of a network of six yards in the Houston-Galveston area that serve the offshore energy and inland new construction and repair markets, is creating a buzz with some of its recent actions. It is said to be in negotiations to add another shipyard, possibly on the East Coast, to its portfolio. It is also said to be scouring international shipyards for a large floating dry dock. No comment was available from FirstWave.
It recently added long-time shipyard executive Thomas Godfrey, formerly of Colonna's Shipyard, Norfolk, Va., to its repair management staff.
In announcing first quarter 1999 earnings, FirstWave president Frank Eakin, said, "Our record backlog in barge new construction has validated our strategy of developing a diversified service mix. While the energy sector is in a slowdown, new construction has helped us fully absorb our labor force in Galveston. We believe our success in avoiding layoffs and retaining skilled people will serve us well when the anticipated energy services upturn occurs."

CURRENT TRENDS
Offshore energy, of course, is an important driver of new construction at U.S. shipyards. Excluding inland barges, equipment for the offshore energy sector represented the largest percentage of deliveries by U.S. shipyards in 1998, according to Marine Log's shipbuilding database. Anchor handlers, offshore supply vessels, lift boats, and mobile offshore drilling units represented roughly 36% of all the self-propelled vessels delivered in the U.S. Most of these vessels were built by facilities along the Gulf Coast. As the price of oil softened and dayrates collapsed, however, orders for these type vessels slackened at the end of 1998 and the first quarter of 1999.
Many shipyards are still awaiting the anticipated surge of orders for OPA 90 compliant tonnage. Currently, only Avondale holds firm contracts for double hull tankships, following the delivery of the last of the Double Eagles by NNS, and the handing over of the second of two 16,000 dwt chemical tankers by Alabama Shipyard, Inc., Mobile, Ala., to Dannebrog.
There was a ripple of orders for articulated tug barge units (ATBs) late last year and early this year. Reinauer and Mobil Oil placed orders for new tonnage, while Bouchard initiated a major conversion program.

BULLISH ON FERRIES
Passenger vessels, including ferries, excursion and dinner boats, showed a resurgence last year, accouting for about 15% of all deliveries of self-propelled vessels. In particular, the ferry market, buoyed by the renewal of the ferry grant program under TEA-21, is almost guaranteed to generate strong demand in this sector over the next five years. Alaska, New Jersey, and Washington state will also benefit from $100 million in earmarked funds under TEA-21 to build new ferries and terminals.
A regional effort is also underway in the San Francisco Bay area that envisions eventually creating a network of 120 high speed ferries connecting 40 terminals. Marine Log will be covering this in more depth in our High Speed Annual in July 1999. Bay Area Council vice president Russell Hancock will also be a featured speaker at Marine Log's Ferries '99 in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., on November 15.

MORE CRUISE SHIPS AHEAD?
All eyes will be focused on Pascagoula, Miss., over the next year, as Ingalls Shipbuilding begins the construction of the first of two U.S. flag, 1,900-passenger, 840 ft cruise ships for American Classic Voyages (AMCV). It will be the first time an American shipyard has tried its hand at building a cruise ship in 40 years. The contract, valued at $880 million, contains an option for a third ship.
American Hawaii will have the opportunity to reflag an existing foreign-flag cruise ship to