|
OWNERS TOO SLOW TO DOUBLE HULL? by John Snyder, Senior Editor With only a limited number of oceangoing double hulled tank barges on order, the OPA 90 mandated double hulling of the U.S. domestic tank vessel fleet could be in jeopardy. The tantalizingly slow pace of double-hull construction in the U.S. could lead to a severe shortage of tank vessels beginning in 2005, according to an analysis released last month by a shipyard industry group. The Washington, D.C., trade group, the Shipbuilders Council of America (SCA), says tank vessel owners need to dramatically increase the pace of double-hull construction to avoid the loss of as much as 28% of the existing U.S.-flag tank vessel capacity by the end of 2004 due to mandatory phase-out dates set by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90). This includes 45% of all large, ocean tank barges, says the SCA. OPA 90 requires all single-hull tank vessels to be rebuilt as or replaced with double hull tank vessels. The analysis is a wake-up call for the industry, says Allen Walker, SCA president. While many have suspected that owners were moving too slowly, says Walker, the SCA analysis confirms this. Continues Walker, The inability of the U.S. to move petroleum products domestically could have a devastating impact on economic and national security, particularly in light of recent events. Other maritime trade groups have recently voiced similar concerns. Both the Maritime Cabotage Task Force and the Sealift Committee of the National Defense Transportation Association have said the lack of tank vessels would significantly diminish the nations ability to meet its domestic transportation demands and its military sealift obligations. A report by the U.S. Coast Guard, at the request of the U.S. Congress, is undertaking a more comprehensive assessment of the progress to replace the single-hulled tank fleet with double-hulled tank vessels. That report, which was originally due out this past February, has yet to be released. Others, such as Vessel Management Services (VMS), Seattle, a unit of Crowley Maritime, have moved quickly in recent months to ink contracts with Manitowoc Marine, Manitowoc, Wis., and Halter Marine, Gulfport, Miss. VMS has orders and options to build as many as ten 155,000 bbl articulated tug barges. Under the contract with Manitowoc, Bay Shipbuilding will build the 512 ft x 78 x 40 ft tank barges and its sister yard, Marinette Marine, will construct the 127 ft x 42 ft, 9,280 hp tugs. The ATBs will use the INTERCON coupler system. All the vessels will be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2002.
Earlier this year, Maritrans chairman and CEO Stephen A. Van Dyck commented, Significant capital investments must be made to replace the single-hulled Jones Act tonnage retiring in the Gulf of Mexico product market. Maritrans double-hull rebuild program is part of that effort, and by the end of 2001 we will have invested $38 million to preserve the life of our single-hulled barges. At that time, 52 percent of our fleet capacity will be double hull. Over the next year, we also will continue engineering to rebuild our existing fleet and evaluating preliminary designs for new vessels. One reason Maritrans went the rebuild route is cost. The cost of rebuilding single-hull barges is about $55-75 per barrel compared to estimated costs of $125-175 per barrel for construction of a completely new double-hull barge. The total cost of rebuilding the companys single-hull fleet is expected to exceed $150 million. Maritrans intends to apply the same rebuild method on up to six more of its ocean single-hull barges and two tankers. The timing of these rebuilds, says Maritrans, will be based on market conditions, shipyard pricing and availability, customer requirements and OPA retirement dates for the vessels, which fall between 2005 and 2010. On September 13, the Senate passed H.R. 2500, the Commerce, Justice and State Appropriations Act for FY2002. The Senate passed version of the bill includes $100 million for the Maritime Administrations Title XI Ship Loan Guarantee Program. The House passed version of the bill provided $30 million for Title XI. |
||||